Legacy 5e Bug Reports

[superteddy57]

The character wizard pulls from spell lists within the campaign. So a spell list would need to be made for that class.

[Tempered7]

The character wizard pulls from spell lists within the campaign. So a spell list would need to be made for that class.

Ah, got it. So it is intended. I couldn't find the place to prepare a spell list for it but drag and drop works, too.

EDIT: Nvm, I just found it. It is a new addition i guess. I will poke around a bit to learn. Thanks.
Anyone who wonders how, check the attachment. (Name the Definition as "Spellcaster")

[rocketvaultgames]

Baldur's Gate: Descent into Avernus - NPC - Feonor - Spell save DC shows as 15 and should be 17 (8 + 5(INT) + 4(PB) = 17 verified on D&D Beyond.

It could also use a slightly cleaned up transparent background image like this (.png as forum won't handle .webp):

Feonor Transparent.png

EDIT: Actually... it looks like there is just an errant 'Innate Spellcasting' section that shows the incorrect spell save and spell attack... I don't think it should be there at all.

[Zacchaeus]

Baldur's Gate: Descent into Avernus - NPC - Feonor - Spell save DC shows as 15 and should be 17 (8 + 5(INT) + 4(PB) = 17 verified on D&D Beyond.

It could also use a slightly cleaned up transparent background image like this (.png as forum won't handle .webp):

Feonor Transparent.png

EDIT: Actually... it looks like there is just an errant 'Innate Spellcasting' section that shows the incorrect spell save and spell attack... I don't think it should be there at all.

The Innate spellcasting is something I added so that the spells would appear in the CT, otherwise they wouldn't appear. I've clearly just miscalculated the Spell save DC. I'll add this and the image to my fix list.

[rocketvaultgames]

The Innate spellcasting is something I added so that the spells would appear in the CT, otherwise they wouldn't appear. I've clearly just miscalculated the Spell save DC. I'll add this and the image to my fix list.

I think the AC is reversed as well... It shows 15 (12 with mage armor).

[Zacchaeus]

I think the AC is reversed as well... It shows 15 (12 with mage armor).

Yeah, it should read 12 without mage armor. Again I changed this from how the book reads (which is 12 (15 with mage armor)); since it also says that the archmage starts with mage armor cast; so it seemed reasonable to make the AC 15 instead of 12.

I'll note to change the wording so it makes sense.

[aatosdeerkko]

Hello
Chapter 6. V01 missing encounter.

best regards

Arto

[Trenloe]

Hello
Chapter 6. V01 missing encounter.

best regards

Arto

Welcome to the FG Forums! I've moved this post to the 5E bug reports thread - this is the best place to report issues with the D&D DLC.

[Zacchaeus]

Hello
Chapter 6. V01 missing encounter.

best regards

Arto

Thanks for the report; I've notified the developer.

[craigbert]

Hi All,

I have confirmed on Discord that the DMG & SRD both report Mithral Armor as having Disadvantage on stealth when it should not.

Thanks,

Craigbert