Breaking Extensions so much

[MartianXi]

Updates shouldn't need to be treated as you suggest... if it ain't broke don't fix it.... there wouldn't be an update if there wasn't some reason to do so. There's an update every week and after many years of cell phone use it becomes second nature to stay updated.

I tend to update because there are often bug fixes involved and maybe it is just a force of habit, but not updating runs the risk of getting so outdated that a single update changes everything so drastically that I have to re-learn an entire program.

I'm not a programmer by any means and have only a basic idea of what's happening behind the scenes but if the updates were setup in different packages with separate bug fix patches and UI/feature updates as optional I think it would make a big difference to the user experience.

This was an expensive program with the original ultimate license pricing and as much as I appreciate it's continued growth I just want a stable platform to work with that doesn't require a bunch of troubleshooting every weekend.

[Trenloe]

...I just want a stable platform to work with that doesn't require a bunch of troubleshooting every weekend.

I'm sorry to labor the point already stated, but the majority (not all, but a large majority) of issues are caused by extensions. You'll need to make a judgement call on how many extensions you feel you *have* to run vs the more you run the more likely you're going to have issues.

[MartianXi]

I'm sorry to labor the point already stated, but the majority (not all, but a large majority) of issues are caused by extensions. You'll need to make a judgement call on how many extensions you feel you *have* to run vs the more you run the more likely you're going to have issues.

True they are caused by extensions, of which I only use three but those three are fairly fundamental in our game.

[Morenu]

Updates shouldn't need to be treated as you suggest... if it ain't broke don't fix it.... there wouldn't be an update if there wasn't some reason to do so. There's an update every week and after many years of cell phone use it becomes second nature to stay updated.

Resist the shiny red box. I always Read the update. We currently play PFrpg, so if there is nothing for PF or CoreRPG that we need, I do not update. I prefer our working extensions. To me as a long time computer user, Other than MAYBE security updates, Don't do OS or Software updates when they first come out. let some other person find the errors. You mentioned Phones... you seriously update immediately when they release a major update? no thanks, I like making and receiving calls.

I tend to update because there are often bug fixes involved and maybe it is just a force of habit, but not updating runs the risk of getting so outdated that a single update changes everything so drastically that I have to re-learn an entire program.

I am not saying DON'T update ever (although that is an option I suppose if everything is 100% working), I am saying to let others find the glaring issues if this type of thing is going to upset you. We KNOW that major FGU changes almost always makes a few of the 30+ extensions we use break. You have an answer, you just do not like the answer.

I'm not a programmer by any means and have only a basic idea of what's happening behind the scenes but if the updates were setup in different packages with separate bug fix patches and UI/feature updates as optional I think it would make a big difference to the user experience.

Now this Idea I like. Hot fixes, spelling mistakes, broken links... anything that has almost no chance of breaking things should be 1 type of update (maybe anything that is not a ruleset?). Then have a Forge only update and then have a ruleset update with a warning "this could break extensions". This would go a LONG way towards helping the issue.

This was an expensive program with the original ultimate license pricing and as much as I appreciate it's continued growth I just want a stable platform to work with that doesn't require a bunch of troubleshooting every weekend.

I paid $100 and have gotten SO MUCH more for my money. No Monthly fee. No yearly upgrade cost... Players can play for free, so $100 allows say 4 people to enjoy playing for as long as SW is around. I absolutely disagree with the expensive program statement. ALSO if you are a 5E player, this is more WotC's problem then it is SW

Obviously we all have our own opinions and experiences. I prefer constructive communication of issues and asking about possible solutions and tend to see a better response from that technique.

I am taking that update suggestion to the Voting for improvement page

[Tooting Dog]

And if SW didn't allow third parties to create extensions, there would be a lot of whining going on, too. They cannot win on this one. Be happy that extensions are allowed and be sure to heed the disclaimer on many extensions that they may conflict, or break, etc. Tabletop play does not use extensions, and you do not need them in this VTT; though I feel they certainly increase enjoyment.